North Maine Woods

Bangor Daily News:

The North Maine Woods, a 3.5-million-acre privately owned working forest, offers extensive recreational opportunities like hiking, camping, and paddling, drawing over 100,000 visitors annually. Managed by a nonprofit coalition of landowners since 1971, access is allowed through 19 gates with a small user fee, but the roads remain private and maintained solely by landowners.

Safety is a top priority, particularly around active logging operations. Logging trucks always have the right of way, and visitors must follow strict road rules: drive with headlights on, stay to the right, obey speed limits, and yield to working vehicles. Radios are recommended to monitor truck traffic, and visitors should carry spare tires due to rough conditions and lack of cell service.

Landowners stress respect for the land and roads to preserve access for future use. The access fee does not fund road maintenance, and misuse could result in road closures. Overall, the North Maine Woods is a successful model of cooperative land use, balancing forestry with public recreation.

Falvo v. Pejepscot Industrial Park

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Sagadahoc County, Brodrick, A.R.J.) denying plaintiffs’ action seeking a declaration that they had acquired certain property by adverse possession.

On appeal plaintiffs argue that the court erred in finding that they failed to prove all the elements of an adverse possession claim. They also argue that the court’s denial of their motion to amend the complaint was an abuse of discretion. We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion to amend, and that the evidence does not compel a finding that plaintiffs proved all the elements of an adverse possession claim.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

Falvo v. Pejepscot 691 A2D 1240

Lyons v. Baptist School of Christian Training, 2002 ME 137, 804 A.2d 364

 

In Lyons v. Baptist School of Christian Training, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court addressed whether long-standing public use of a private roadway gave rise to a public prescriptive easement. The plaintiffs, local residents, claimed the public had used a road on the Baptist School’s Chapman lot for over 20 years for recreational activities such as hunting, snowmobiling, and accessing nearby properties and waterways. They asserted that such use established a public right to the road.

Although the Superior Court agreed with the plaintiffs and found a public easement by prescription, the Law Court reversed. The Court emphasized that Maine law presumes recreational use of unposted, open land is permissive—not adverse—unless there is clear evidence of a hostile or antagonistic claim of right. Because witnesses largely testified that they believed the landowner permitted their use—or would have respected “No Trespassing” signs if posted—the Court concluded there was insufficient evidence of the adversity required to establish a public easement.

The decision reaffirms Maine’s tradition of presumed landowner permission for public recreational use and underscores the high burden of proving adversity when seeking to establish public prescriptive rights over private land.

 

Almeder v. Town of Kennebunkport

“Two motions for reconsideration are pending before us regarding the public’s use of Goose Rocks Beach in the Town of Kennebunkport. The Town and the State of Maine have each moved for reconsideration of our decision in Almeder v. Town of Kennebunkport, 2014 ME 12, issued on February 4, 2014. The plaintiffs oppose the motions, and we held oral argument on the motions.

By this order, we DENY the State’s motion for reconsideration of our decision regarding the public trust doctrine, and we DENY in part and GRANT in part the Town’s motion seeking reconsideration of the public trust issue and a remand for the trial court to complete a parcel-by-parcel factual analysis of the Town’s public prescriptive easement claim. We simultaneously reissue the opinion as amended.”

ALMEDER 106 A3D 1099